F*&! Joe Torre

Since Joe Torre breaks our hearts, this blog will break his balls. Every day of the season I will detail the errors, misjudgements, and omissions that make him the most overrated manger in the history of the game (even more than Tommy Lasorda!). But Joe Torre is not just one bum in hero's clothing (i.e. the pinstripes); he is the quintessential counterfeit of excellence, a figure who embodies the triumph of the ersatz that pervades every aspect of our culture. No organization in sport, nay in civilization generally, has manifested a committment to continuing greatness like the New York Yankees, a beacon to all, in every field of endeavor, that the best is always possible. How intolerable is it then that the Yankees should be managed by a mediocrity on stilts, a figure with a reputation for greatness without any of the attributes thereof. Beginning with Torre and ending with Torre, this blog will look to smash idols we create out of inadvertence, ignorance, and complacency.

Saturday, April 22, 2006

Redialing Mr. Steinbrenner

I've heard some talk about how the Yankees' start this year is considerably better than last year's 11-19 and thus no casue for concern, let alone action. Two points. First and most obvious, last year didn't turn out so well. Struggling heroically to make the playoffs is not necessarily the best plan for winning the playoffs. Second and more important, last year the Yankees really struggled in every phase of the game. The pitching was below expectation, the hitting was weak, the fielding was as always egregious. This year Jouhnson has pitched to expectations, Mussina has considerably exceeded them. Chacon has been off, but he's still 1-1; only Wang has dissapointed. Meanwhile everybody is hitting. Jeter's at .351, Arod's over 300, as is Williams, Posada, Sheffield and Cano. Giambi's near the lead league in both on base and slugging percentage. Damon's under 300 but his obp is fine. And they are still losing with stunning regularity. A slump is a slump and it is bound to put your situational hitting down the crapper. But when the team is statistically on fire and the situational hitting is still down the crapper, you have one of those situations that defies sabremetric rationality and makes baseball the compelling game it is--i.e. there is a small, undecidable gap between achieving, even as a team, and winning. You can occasionally do the later without doing the former (see the 1996 Yankees) and you can certainly do the former without doing the latter (see the Yankees today). In baseball, you see, there are winners and there are losers.

It's time for the Yankees to confront what they are fast becoming.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home